KL
Novice
Aug 13, 2004, 9:49 PM
Post #1 of 8
(1867 views)
Shortcut
|
MPSJ back in Action
|
Can't Post
|
|
Hi guys and fellow dog lovers, Is there anyone out there read the article from yesterday (12/08/2004) Star paper reads that MPSJ is going to impose the most stupid regulation where the dog owner need his/her neighbour permission (not only the one on your left or right but front and back) before you own a dog. I think this sound stupid and it may ended up with r***cial issue. I will fully support MPSJ impose such rulling only if it apply to all animal inclusive of cats, iguana, snake......... others. Why only dogs? Hi fellow from MPSJ, do remember this is a mutiracial country, as far as I kept my pet dog in my own compound and it did not distrub other what is the problem??? If using this rulling as a tool or vehicle to improve neighbour hood relationship, Hmmmmm........ I think MPSJ must be joking with all dog lovers... This issue might ended up with a reverse effect. Imagine I went over to my nieghbour house whom I never or hardly see each other and ask for permission or signature to keep dogs. What will be the most likely outcome? And what will happend next? We dislike each other... ha ha ha is this a way to improve relationship? I believe there are many ways to create better relationship among neighbour such as organise sport activies, clean up subang in one day... etc. Please think twice before impose any regulation for the benefits of all!!! You may argue that there are many complain about dogs etc..If this is the case, please go to the root of the problem........... be mature!! In this case, let ask as dog lovers, what are we going to doing for our pets and what is our association such as MKA do? If we allow this happend at MPSJ sooner will be follow by MPSA, MP...... etc. And one day, we do not need puppy.com, MKA or any related organisations, and lots of people lost his/ her job, pet shop closing down...... See this can be very serious!!!!!
|