Home


  Main Index MAIN
INDEX
FAQ FAQ & HELP FAQ PHOTO GALLERY Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE
Log in LOG
IN

Home: Dog and Puppies Talk: Dog's Rights and Protection:
The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered.





First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 12:37 AM

Post #1 of 35 (15787 views)
Shortcut
The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. Can't Post

hello all you dog kakis

Since there isn't any specific thread that compiles all the ruling of MPSJ license issuance and ruling, and there has been a lot of confusion about getting a license from MPSJ lately, i suppose I'll just post up the content that I have here with the MPSJ "Garis Panduan Untuk Pemunya Anjing" brochure (PEMUNYA anjing??? apa tu pemunya anjing Crazy)... just for the priviledge of those that have not read the brochure. sorry, but BM version is all that i got Frown

Apa Yang Perlu Anda Lakukan Untuk Memelihara Seekor Anjing Di Kawasan MPSJ
-Perlu dapatkan lesen anjing bagi anjing yang berumur 3 bulan ke atas
-Lesen anjing boleh diperolehi di Jabatan Kesihatan dan Perkhidmatan Bandar,
Majils Perbandaran Subang Jaya
-Pemohon hendaklah mematuhi syarat-syarat di dalam borang permohonan
-Lencana lesen anjing perlu sentiasa digantung di leher anjing

Apa Syarat-syarat Yang Perlu Dipatuhi Untuk Mendapatkan Lesen Anjing?
-Memberikan bukti pemeriksaan kesihatan dan suntikan pelalian anjing berkenaan
oleh doktor veterinar yang berdaftar atau Pegawai Haiwan Kerajaan
-Pemohon dikehendaki membayar RM 15.00 untuk lesen anjing tersebut
-Perlu memperolehi serta mendapat keizinan secara bertulis daripada jiran terdekat

Apa Tanggungjawab Pemunya Anjing
(Semasa di premis kediaman)
-
Menyelenggara serta mempastikan najis
dan air kencing serta air cucian najis atau air kencing disalurkan terus ke pusat
rawatan najis serta tidak boleh mengalir ke halaman jiran terdekat atau di jalan
awam
-Menyelenggara rumah anjing dan kawasan rumah sentiasa bersih
-Membuang dan menyelenggara najis dan sisa-sisa makanan tanpa menyebabkan
kacau ganggu kepada orang lain semasa di dalam premis dan di luar premis
-Mempastikan anjing tidak mengganggu jiran dengan salakan yang tidak henti dan
berterusan.

(Di luar premis)
-memasukkan najis anjing yang dihasilkan di luar premis ke dalam plastik dan dilupuskan
dengan cara yang sempurna (Beg plastik perlu dibawa bersama semasa berada di luar
premis)

Berapa Bilangan Anjing Yang Dibenarkan?
- Luas kawasan < 1,000 meter persegi = tidak melebihi 2 ekor
- Luas kawasan > 1,000 meter persegi = 4 ekor maksima

ANJING TIDAK BOLEH DIPELIHARA DI RUMAH PANGSA, PANGSAPURI, KONDOMINIUM DAN
RUMAH KEDAI (KECUALI KELULUSAN KHAS UNTUK KES-KES TERTENTU
(sorry 'bout the caps condo ppl.. it's all in caps from the brochure here Unsure)

Larangan Memelihara Anjing dari Baka-baka Tersebut:
-Akita
-American Bulldog
-Dogo Argentino
-Fila Braziliero
-Japanese Tosa
-Neopolitan Mastiff
-Pit Bull Terrier/Pitt Bull (termasuk American Pit Bull, American Pit Bull Terrier, American
Staffordshire Terrier dan Staffordshire Bull Terrier)

Apakah Yang Tidak Boleh Dilakukan Oleh Pemilik Anjing?
-Membiarkan dan melepaskan anjing merayau di luar kawasan premis pemunya
-Membawa anjing bersiar-siar di luar premis tanpa berikat dan bersarung mulut serta
membuang najis di tempat-tempat awam seperti:
Taman/padang permainan
Padang bola
Kompleks membeli-belah
Rumah ibadat
Semua pejabat awam kerajaan dan swasta
Sekolah kerajaan dan swasta
Pengangkutan awam
-Anjing yang berkeliaran tanpa berikat dan bersarung mulut (berlesen atau tanpa berlesen)
akan ditangkap sekiranya operasi sedang dijalankan tanpa sebarang notis amaran.
-Pihak majlis berhak menangkap atau mengambil anjing yang dengan sengaja atau tidak
dibawa ke taman/padang permainan, tempat-tempat tumpuan awam, kompleks perniagaan,
masjid dan rumah ibadat, sekolah (kerajaan dan swasta), bangunan awam serta lain-lain
tempat yang ditetapkan oleh majlis.

Apakah Tindakan Yang akan Diambil Jika Pemunya Anjing Engkar?
-Pemunya boleh didenda tidak lebih daripada RM2,000.00 atau penjara tidak lebih daripada
satu tahun atau kedua-duanya sekali (UKK Perlesanan Anjing MPSJ 1998)

NO. TEL :
03-80263131 samb.
3171, 1160 (waktu pejabat)

HOTLINE MPSJ :
03-56376545



oh btw, this year's MPSJ license is maroon color. Got a free paper bag too Laugh


aragorn2976
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 12:43 AM

Post #2 of 35 (15775 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

Hey hey!!

Thanks for the info man!! LaughLaugh I got the forms at the end of 2003 and they had the letter thingys all ready for us... UnsureUnsure

Now, I have to go to my neighbour's and ask for their autograph... BlushBlush

BTW, What's in the paper bag?? SlySly Or is it a sample what a poop bag looks like when our doggies are taken out for a walk? LaughLaughLaugh



Join the JRT Zone


Beloved, let us love one another, because love is of God; everyone who loves is begotten by God and knows God. - 1 John 4:7 (Oofy's motto)


hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 12:50 AM

Post #3 of 35 (15774 views)
Shortcut
Re: [aragorn2976] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

you registering or renewing your dog's license?

we renewed our dog's license today, we was told that by next year then only we'll be required to get neighbour's autograph la.

the paper bag has MPSJ link on it :/ it's just an empty paper bag, but a long lasting one, made from cloth :) wanted to get a red one but the clerk insists that i get the blue coz it's at another counterrrrr :(

maybe it's a bag to keep POO bags. lol.


aragorn2976
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 1:59 AM

Post #4 of 35 (15771 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

SlySly...

New dog.. New license... LaughLaughLaugh.... Anyway, get my neighbours to sign, after all, both side own dogs and they know Snoopy... LaughLaughLaugh

Haha... Good idea!! LaughLaughLaugh My Dad has this thing where he'll save Snoopy's poo for a few days before disposing.. CrazyCrazyCrazy Hmmmm....



Join the JRT Zone


Beloved, let us love one another, because love is of God; everyone who loves is begotten by God and knows God. - 1 John 4:7 (Oofy's motto)


mackmack
Doggyman


Feb 7, 2004, 2:30 AM

Post #5 of 35 (15770 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

good good....!
let's compile all other MPPX MPPY rulings here ....

erm.....
would it be the same for cheras?
cheras under.... DBKL??? or?
Crazy


--I have Howling Bean and Lazy Mack.--


eli
Enthusiast


Feb 7, 2004, 3:20 AM

Post #6 of 35 (15768 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

i've been cheated!
got my dogs' licences renewed on wednesday (long, long wait to pay!) and no-one gave me a cloth or paper bag!
i did receive a "notice" to get neighbour's OK for next year's renewal.

oh, i wanted a new licence for my 10-mth-old puppy but clerk said she "tak berani" grant me one because new ruling states ALL houses limited to 2 dogs.
told her i live in an end lot with garden but she said to check with the officer in charge who was conveniently out for "siasatan".
i didn't wait.


hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 8:54 AM

Post #7 of 35 (15761 views)
Shortcut
Re: [aragorn2976] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

hey at least both sides know snoopy well.

but anyway to save the hassle the lady said u can just say no neighbours, just like what other members did :)


hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 9:01 AM

Post #8 of 35 (15760 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mackmack] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

for sure every council have many different set of rules. how absurd. they should standardize a same set of rules in the whole malaysia la.

cheras under KL, no? should be DBKL. oi, mackmack no license???? >:(


hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 9:06 AM

Post #9 of 35 (15759 views)
Shortcut
Re: [eli] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

hi

no la, don't feel cheated coz the bag is not worth you feeling cheated >:( just a lousy ugly color bag with MPSJ url.

an end lot with a garden can keep more than 2 dogs. at least that's what the clerk said to my mom today (we live in a corner house with some land). anyway, she don't really care about it.




regards,
hunter


mackmack
Doggyman


Feb 7, 2004, 5:34 PM

Post #10 of 35 (15757 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

of course he has licence!
hasn't renew for this year....


--I have Howling Bean and Lazy Mack.--


melissa
ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 6:58 PM

Post #11 of 35 (15755 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

HI Hunter

Thx for the compilation, it is very useful!
So I'm safe as my new house which ready to move in in the month of March 04 is a corner lot, so must get ready all the necessary docs Smile.

Btw, so I only need to obtain one signature instead of two since my house is a corner lot, right?



Click here to join Poodles' Friendly Gang ListSmile


My three furkids ^_^ Gigi, Cherry & Belle ^_^



hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 7:20 PM

Post #12 of 35 (15753 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mackmack] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

lazy owner now what month already. fast fast apply!!! mackmack cannot be illegal. he's too good to break the law in malaysia!


melissa
ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 7:27 PM

Post #13 of 35 (15752 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

cheras should under Ampang Jaya Smile, right?



Click here to join Poodles' Friendly Gang ListSmile


My three furkids ^_^ Gigi, Cherry & Belle ^_^



hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 7:31 PM

Post #14 of 35 (15751 views)
Shortcut
Re: [melissa] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

lol, heck i have no idea cheras under who actually. DBKL a wild guess :/

i'm glad you find the compilation useful because i dug the brochure out from my house's trash can yesterday after my mom threw it away :|

yes, i suppose if you're in a corner lot it's only logic you get one signature.


melissa
ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 7:42 PM

Post #15 of 35 (15749 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

thx hunter, will find a day to go to MPSJ to check out the detail Smile



Click here to join Poodles' Friendly Gang ListSmile


My three furkids ^_^ Gigi, Cherry & Belle ^_^



mackmack
Doggyman


Feb 7, 2004, 8:10 PM

Post #16 of 35 (15748 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

lazy ur head! read from somewhere in the forum that new tag only available in April....CrazyMad
asked dad already... cheras under DBKL. Dad got the current licence from Taman Midah. very near oh~


--I have Howling Bean and Lazy Mack.--


hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 7, 2004, 9:06 PM

Post #17 of 35 (15745 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mackmack] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

Ooooo

what kind of law is this April only get?

so next year's April then only expire? impossible.. think it's more likely 2005 january expire.. like that it's not worth it la :(

this year DBKL license what color? what color was it last year?

oh everyone, have a correction to make also. MPSJ license is RED this year, not maroon as i stated earlier :/


mackmack
Doggyman


Feb 7, 2004, 9:40 PM

Post #18 of 35 (15744 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

  is wearing the RED one now.


--I have Howling Bean and Lazy Mack.--


eli
Enthusiast


Feb 10, 2004, 12:04 AM

Post #19 of 35 (15728 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

hehehe, not that i really care for the bag but after the long wait, i should be entitled to something! :)
even gave their canteen some business while i was there.

as for end-lot, that is what i thot. otherwise i wouldn't have dared agree to taking a third dog. but the clerk was pretty insistent this is NEW ruling. one of the new things they want to impose on dog lovers - like the approval of neighbours.

i'd like to see the day dog lovers are asked how many people can their dogs tolerate living next door to them! :)


aragorn2976
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 10, 2004, 5:59 AM

Post #20 of 35 (15703 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

Cool... Yea....

Heard of that... LaughLaughLaugh Will give it a shot... Tongue



Join the JRT Zone


Beloved, let us love one another, because love is of God; everyone who loves is begotten by God and knows God. - 1 John 4:7 (Oofy's motto)


phoenix
K9 Kaki


Feb 11, 2004, 1:02 AM

Post #21 of 35 (15695 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

They should apply this license to cat owners as well lah! Cats are actually worst! And they are harder to train also. Their pee and poo smells terrible and lingers even after you have washed the stained item a million times!!





"The reason a dog has so many friends, is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue"
- Anonymous

The Poisoned One speaks


hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 11, 2004, 8:28 AM

Post #22 of 35 (15683 views)
Shortcut
Re: [phoenix] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

mmm i don't suppose they'd care much about a dog owner's complaint :/ ..............:(

guess what we could do now is just comply to their strict rules to keep our dogs by our side legally. if not, they'd find more stricter rules to impose on us :(


phoenix
K9 Kaki


Feb 11, 2004, 5:44 PM

Post #23 of 35 (15674 views)
Shortcut
Re: [hunter] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post


Quote
mmm i don't suppose they'd care much about a dog owner's complaint


True, true!! Frown





"The reason a dog has so many friends, is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue"
- Anonymous

The Poisoned One speaks


snoopydog
Enthusiast

Feb 21, 2004, 2:16 AM

Post #24 of 35 (15653 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ALL] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

Hi everyone, here are some contrasting views from The Star readers.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dogged by biased ruling

THE recently introduced ruling by the Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ) compelling dog owners to seek permission from their immediate neighbours in order to obtain a dog licence has generated a lot of displeasure and resentment as it is humiliating.

While we certainly should sympathise with some residents who are being terrorised by their neighbours’ dogs, it is questionable whether there is a need to have such a draconian one-sided ruling on dog licensing.

The MPSJ should, instead, act diligently on complaints against errant dog-owners and also round up the strays.

The lingering problem that some terrorised residents might have been facing is akin to the traffic congestion caused by errant motorists and restaurant operators.

When there is lack of enforcement or none at all, it is easily understandable to see the blatant persistence of misconduct amongst errant dog owners, motorists and restaurant owners.

Hence, it all boils down to enforcement.

This new regulation is biased against responsible dog owners in a number of respects. It is an undue violation of their private property rights.

Though not all of them have vicious neighbours, some who are unfortunate may find themselves being denied the right to keep dogs as pets within their very own premises by unreasonable neighbours.

Some may have to constantly please their neighbours so as not to risk the prospect of not being able to renew their dog licences when the time comes.

While aggrieved residents could at least complain to MPSJ of the nuisance posed by their neighbours’ dogs, what recourse would be available to those being unfairly denied the opportunity to keep dogs as pets?

Can they complain to MPSJ as well?

Furthermore, some may end up not being able to maintain dogs as an added security to their homes, against thefts and burglaries.

The ruling is not only unjust to humans but to dogs as well. Just because there are rogue ones amongst them, should we dismiss all of them as such?

Dogs have also contributed to humanity in many ways. One instance would be their role in emergency rescue operations.

DR E.C. TAN,

Subang Jaya.


(via e-mail)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dog licence ruling can bring back quiet nights

I REFER to the letter, “Dogged by biased ruling”, (The Star, Feb 19).

Sure, everybody has the right to keep pets, such as dogs. I, too, like dogs. At the same time, people also have the right to quiet and uninterrupted nights of sleep.

My neighbour, two doors away, owns a dog which barks most nights around 4am to be taken for a walk! His owner brings him out after the dog has woken up almost half the neighbourhood.

Inconsiderate dog owners also think nothing of letting their dogs defecate right in front of other people’s houses.

The Subang Jaya Municipal Council’s new ruling requiring owners to seek their immediate neighbours' consent for a dog licence may not be the perfect solution. But it’s a start.

ANNOYED,
Petaling Jaya.

(via e-mail)


hunter
Ultra ALPHA


Feb 21, 2004, 2:23 AM

Post #25 of 35 (15652 views)
Shortcut
Re: [snoopydog] The MPSJ ruling of dog ownership -questions answered. [In reply to] Can't Post

the first letter is true, enforcement is key and it's unfair that many of us are denied the right to keep our dogs at our own premises.

if the person is not happy about the dog barking at 4am go ahead and make a complaint. it's none of other responsible dog owner's business. don't expect the whole world to change just to suit your needs. wonder if i can send in a mail to the star too.

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All
 
 




Copyright 2001~ 2002 Hileytech Sdn Bhd , All Rights Reserved.  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement
For comments and Suggestion, Please contact the Webmaster at puppy@puppy.com.my