Home: Dog and Puppies Talk: Current Dog Related Issues and News:
New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)



mydragoon
Dog Kichi


Jul 28, 2005, 9:35 PM


Views: 5947
New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Today's news from The Star ( http://thestar.com.my/...8323&sec=central) says doggies and owners must take tests and courses beginning (most likely) next year.

I think if they make this mandatory, then doggies should then be allowed into more places. After all, with the courses, it would mean they are 'well behaved' doggies...

But the courses so long... Wonder how will be be? Weekly? Or like NS - send to camp?!?

Comments?


ERN
K9 Maniac


Jul 29, 2005, 2:36 AM


Views: 5924
Re: [mydragoon] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Also,

it shouldnt be any banned breeds anymore. As, APBT, AST, BT, dogo, AB, nepolitan and rottie, all can sit for the test and pass it with flying color.

I have an AST, my friends own AST, for ALL AST I have seen they just love human. More than GR do.

Frown

View my photo album

last update, ZEUS & Shiki's 2nd off springs, 16/09/2008. Yes 9.16!

http://s56.photobucket.com/...%20Zeus%20N%20Shiki/

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/ERN2/Dogs


PSY
K9 Kaki


Jul 29, 2005, 6:16 AM


Views: 5908
Re: [mydragoon] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Wow, so enthusiastic about this, however it got me thinking : M.K.A. is in the forefront, can conduct training and even certify a dog is canine good citizen, you get your license, what if the dog does bite someone after that, who is responsible, M.K.A. or the owner. The standard set I assume is identical or base on the A.K.C. format which I think to make sure your dog is not threaten by a pram, a wheelchair going by, umbrellas being open or being swung while being held, etc, etc . Do you really think some "wealthy friends" will give up their week-end of golf to go for the training..... this may lead to "hanky-panky" eg. someone will probably offer a package deal to stand-in for the owner or even sell a cert What if your dog fails the test, there will be alot of owners that would not fork out another lump sum of money to have the dog re-trained and tested again so, the dogs will left in the street or abandoned.....ammunition for the authority to use decent dog owners.

Please do not ask if I have any ideas because I do not in fact I am getting very concern about this ludicrious idea being adopted by all councils. The only one happy here is M.K.A.


mydragoon
Dog Kichi


Jul 29, 2005, 5:16 PM


Views: 5888
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Read somewhere that MPSJ will start this in Sept. Not sure how true, though the paper report says next year.

My concerns are like what you said:

- what if the courses are not scheduled at suitable time? does it mean owners need to take leave.

- if this one proves 'successful' chances are, it will spread to all MP**... At the moment, I'm under MPPJ. :)

- if they are to conduct courses and tests on that, i would expect doggies will be allowed at more places

- and what if someday i own a 'stupid' dog that does not bite, but dunno how to listen to instructions?!?


JoeSmith
K9 Maniac


Jul 29, 2005, 8:44 PM


Views: 5882
Re: [mydragoon] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Thank you for the info.

I am not so enthusiastic about it. I don’t think that this would change anything about banned breeds but quite opposite that it might be used to limit further. Some questions coming to mind:

- what happen during the initial time until your puppy is old enough to go to class and pass the test?

- what happen when your puppy is not allowed for class (e.g. any so called restricted breed dog)?

- what happen when your puppy fails the test? put him down? allowed to train again? who will decide that and what would be the time frame/cost?

- what happen to all the protection dogs? My dog will certainly react when you swing an umbrella in front of him or against me.Lots of unanswered questions but I try to stay positive and hope that this rule might improve the responsible dog ownership.


chrisong
Doggyman

Jul 30, 2005, 6:43 AM


Views: 5837
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Next Year All staff of MPxx and M.K.A got 2 month bonus!!! Hahahaha


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


Jul 30, 2005, 8:37 AM


Views: 5832
Re: [mydragoon] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

I am going to errol my furkid to Ob class this coming month.. ..If i wasnt mistaken..there is a test exaclty know as Good Canine Citizen, if Bobby past that test, wonder he have to take again with MKA or not?? If yes, then waste my money training lor??

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu


(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414

http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Jul 31, 2005, 6:22 AM


Views: 5812
Re: [nicky_spykeaz] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

ur staying in mpsj meh ?

cheers,
minglmy


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Jul 31, 2005, 6:26 AM


Views: 5808
Re: [mydragoon, PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

PSY, I agreed to what you have written.

All things can happen .... and what u have put up eg : after successfully pass the test, so what ? dogs that is being bullied or provoke will in any sense bite or react accordingly (to their instinct) therefore who will be responsible ? the one who pass the dog ?

Dogs that is trained on CGC, if they are not consistently being "trained" outside on socialisation n etc after the proper training, what you will get is the same untrained dog. Socialisation does not means u go for a test or a training for 10 weeks and that's it ! its a long term thingy.

I doubt that the rest of the MPXX or DBXX will follow suit. There is also a lot of implications if they were to put in this rule country wide.

cheers,
minglmy


PSY
K9 Kaki


Jul 31, 2005, 7:28 AM


Views: 5798
Re: [nicky_spykeaz] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Just a thought, MPSJ will only recognise M.K.A. cert on so I think PPC may not be applicable so you still have to pay that RM30.00 to sit for the test. I shall confirm that with you.


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


Jul 31, 2005, 5:47 PM


Views: 5790
Re: [minglmy] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Mine area is under MPSJ...So i have to make sure all the rule about ownership must follow, if not i mati lor...

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu


(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414

http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


Jul 31, 2005, 5:48 PM


Views: 5786
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

thank you..really appreciate it..

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu


(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414

http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


mugmug
Novice

Aug 2, 2005, 6:05 AM


Views: 5740
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

  
I am in MPSJ, :C

Thinking to enrol the coming obedience training class for my puppy, just want to know is it recognise by MPSJ?

Saw the syllabus for Puppy class and Basic obedience training almost the same, which one should i go? can i skip the puppy class?

btw, my puppy is 4 months old now


(This post was edited by Admin on Aug 9, 2005, 4:03 AM)


mydragoon
Dog Kichi


Aug 2, 2005, 5:14 PM


Views: 5732
Re: [mugmug] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

honestly, i dun think anyone here has much information.

i checked mpsj website a few days ago and there was no mention of this at all. a quick check again this morning gave the same result. nothing i found find (unless it's hidden deep inside somewhere). have to admit, i never bothered checking out mpsj site until this news came out. coz i'm not in mpsj area.


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 2, 2005, 8:46 PM


Views: 5721
Re: [mugmug] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hi,

You know something, I do not many of us actually have thought this through, I am training my dogs, no problem with this CGC test but I just realise it is a waste of time for many dog owners who are keeping dogs to protect their house and home. My dogs are friendly and most ppl can approach them but they are suppose to protect my home too and ppl inside so does that mean I have to teach them to attack too....so the test thing is incomplete. Scenario: Taking an evening walk and being rob...my dob goes to automatic sit and think to itself (hey when you idiots finish fooling around, call me ok!!!).

Fact ; there are a lot of robberies now in particular SS2 so what are we to do? A fellow resident who had a dob had his house robbed, police advise get another dob to keep the other company. Ideas here would be greatly appreciated.


darenong
Enthusiast


Aug 3, 2005, 8:25 PM


Views: 5704
Re: [mydragoon] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

 
who is running the show ? will there be a double standard thing goin on ? i have a puppy say 4 months .. will lick just about anyone ... in 1 yr time i dont think anyone will let him lick ! go figure hahaha how to confirm then he is GOOD Citizen ? doh!
to teach animal to behave like human is i think the most stupidiest attempt to qualify ownership of the animal .. hahaha doink! just an opinion
BLAME THE OWNER ! thats all dont blame the breed ! does this not make enough sense ? u drive a car u bang someone u dont blame the car for its a sport car and can go very fast u blame the driver ... in a not so similar case its the owner that OWN the dog so i guess it should be very appropriate if i say to blame the owner.


FrownFrownSimba - the Shih Tzu kingFrownFrown
http://spaces.msn.com/...lt&_c=photoalbum
Dogster me! @ http://www.dogster.com/?156485

Pets they said are men's best friend. Are men pets best guardian?


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Aug 9, 2005, 3:44 AM


Views: 5689
Re: [mugmug] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hi mugmug,

Puppy class n basic obedience is the same type syllabus. Difference is handling of both during the training. Adult dogs tends to need more harsher tone to train in compare to puppy which is easier but needs more patience.

Thats why the 2 class being separated.

For a 4 mths old puppy you should join in the puppy class. more ever it will be more fun to play with other puppy around and you can relate to each another your experience on puppy hood.

Do come to tmn desa to see the training by the trainer also the trainee... its fun!

cheers,
minglmy


robros
K9 Maniac


Aug 10, 2005, 1:06 AM


Views: 5657
Re: [minglmy] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

I fully support the need for obedience training for ALL dogs. I went for the obedience training and put my doggie through several levels. It's mainly to train the owners on how to handle their doggies. Actually, one can learn a lot more in those classes than just obedience training.

I must say, it helped me a lot in handling my rottie. Nevertheless, the obedience training did not deter my male from his protection mode. He is still extremely protective of the house and also myself. He does not allow any stranger to approach me unless I allow it.


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Aug 10, 2005, 1:16 AM


Views: 5651
Re: [robros] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hi,

Yes I too support the need for Obedience training. Most of the dog owner that we have seen are mostly controlled by their dog instead of them handling the dog. At times, its sad to see a doberman pulling the little boy everywhere - imagine if the dober is fierce or have temprement problem or a toddler runs towards the dog without knowing. That could be dangerous to both parties.

Obedience is handling, control, understanding, bonding with/of you own dog and of course many more. Dogs that have "instinct" of working will not be killed by going obedience training.

Its the dog that have the instinct n owner does not know how to control/handle that makes those problem like dog running out biting ppl n etc more severe as its during that time the handling dog part comes into play. eg sit stay the dog and recall of the dog n etc.

cheers,
minglmy


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 11, 2005, 5:58 AM


Views: 5607
Re: [minglmy] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hi,

I have a dob and now I have a problem, it does not go on guard mode anymore. She will bark when certain people suspicious walk pass but if that person approach her she would just stop and 'sus' the person out and very likely becomes friend so what on earth for having a doberman? This obedience "crap" may not be that good for some dog owners. People who runs the council love their home to be invaded by people and love to be rob so it is fine for them to impose GCC thingy. As mentioned by Robros, his rottie is good, great but really if I am to rob his house I would take that chance and make friends with his dog.

I do strongly feel everyone should think about this "obedience thing" before saying it is a good thing.


JoeSmith
K9 Maniac


Aug 11, 2005, 7:28 PM


Views: 5587
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

What I know about the CGC training. For me, it is some sort of simplified obedience training, something any person could achieve with any type of dog.

I support the dog training request, because many dog owners have no control over the dog, e.g. they are taken for a walk by the dog, not visa versa. The dog is in control and it seems that they are wearing the collar and the dog holds the leash. I support it, because when the dog is not trained at all then the dog might become a nuisance and in some cases a liability. Both increases the army of people who hate dogs.

I would recommend that you check your dobi’s attitude and if found OK then enroll him into Schutzhund training.Simple test: Play tag-o-war and check if he does “the kill”, means shaking his head vigorously. Put him in the sit position and drag an object in front of him (across). Is he interested? Is he scared? Not bothered at all? If he is interested and does the kill then nothing wrong with your dog, just enroll him and within a short period of time he will be on full guard again.


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 12, 2005, 4:24 AM


Views: 5557
Re: [JoeSmith] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hi,

Thanks for the advise. The dob is fine but my issue here is when a stranger makes friend she will reponse and I do not want this. I notice alot of so call trained dogs do that. I am against one test and that is the one whereby you can leave your dog with a stranger for a moment of time, this really bugs me. The rest walking through a crowd and heeling is great.


chrisong
Doggyman

Aug 12, 2005, 6:33 AM


Views: 5556
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

How come you want a dob that want to bite stranger? What if one day you forgot to close your gate he run out and bite a kid then how? Banned doberman?


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 13, 2005, 2:28 AM


Views: 5536
Re: [chrisong] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hi,

a very good point, my dogs do not run out when the gates are open, 100% will not run out even when a dog passes the house she would charge out of their kennels and stop where the gate (invisible boundary) is whether I am at home or not. If you ask me will my dog snap at anyone, I can not say 100% it will not but running out of the house compound no way. On the subject of biting, there are numerous break-in now in my neighbourhood so hence the bite.

Those are my reasons.


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Aug 13, 2005, 2:51 AM


Views: 5531
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hi PSY,

Well, I found your reply funny. 1st n foremost, if you want a "Guard" dog, find a working line dog not a pet quality and expect your dog to do "guarding". Dobes does have guarding instinct BUT not all infact based on what I have read so far.... if a person is serious about guard dog my advise would be - get a 'working line dog" train your dog SchH and voila, u get a trained guard dog. Pls note that watch dog n guard dog have 2 different meaning.

I can expect a dog or any dog to be a watch dog but not any dog breed can be a guard dog.

Dobes are not known to be fierce (to me). Even though in their temprement its written guarding mode, due to the evolving generations not all dobes still have the same instinct anymore. Most dobes I met are very extremely friendly fella.

Getting a dog as a alarm system ? I might as well get a alarm system that can wake the whole neighbourhood. Dog can bark day in day out and sometimes the neighbour cudn't even be bother as they are so used to the dog's barking.

Obedience is a form of control of own dog. A dog that is not controllable of no use. This kind of dog will/can be dangerous to anyone outside or walking pass by.

Anyway, here are some of the interesting reading I found on dobes temprement n characteristic.

www.dogbreedinfo.com/doberman.htm

Temprement :

Bred for a century to be an outstanding guard dog, the Doberman Pinscher is intense and energetic with tremendous strength and stamina. Versatile, highly intelligent and very easy to train. Determined, fearless and assertive, but not vicious. Noble, loyal and affectionate with the family. It likes to be physically close to the family members. Devoted and watchful, this is a very people oriented breed. The Doberman needs an owner who is willing and able to discipline the dog without being afraid of him. All family members should learn to handle the dog properly, as Dobermans can be pushy if allowed to have their own way too much. The Doberman is naturally protective and does not need additional "protection" training to be a fine guard dog. In fact he should be thoroughly socialized when young to prevent over-protectiveness. Mental stimulation is important for a truly well-adjusted and happy Dobe. The Doberman must be consistently and thoroughly trained to be a good pet. Training should be through positive reinforcement. Dobes can be good family dogs if of good temperament, well trained and raised with children from early puppyhood. Best with experienced owners. Female Dobes are a little more stubborn to train than the male. Although the Doberman has the reputation of being a very aggressive dog, this is just not the case. For example, Dobes make great therapy dogs. They are sweet and gentle with nursing-home patients - tippy-toeing over IV tubing and walking at the resident's speed (which can be very slow), while at the same time will fiercely defend his master if it becomes necessary. These dogs are like big, protective babies. Doberman Pinschers have many talents including tracking, watchdogging, guarding, police work, military work, search & rescue, therapy work, competitive obedience and schutzhund. Aggression towards other dogs is accepted in the AKC standard. Though generally a dominant breed, Dobermans vary greatly in temperament. Some are even very submissive. Some individuals are family dogs, and some bond only to one person. The Doberman has been bred to work with man, and he needs this interaction often. They must be with family, and not abandoned to the backyard.

/Athens/1878/dobefaq.html

DESCRIPTION

The Doberman is a power packed medium sized dog. The Dobe has a beautifully wedge shaped head, a well arched neck that flows into smooth fitting shoulders which blend into a firm strong topline. Connect this with a muscular rear assembly and a well turned stifle, with tight fitting skin covered with short close fitting coat and you have a clean crisp silhouette of a dog that possesses an air of nobility, an alertness to his surroundings, and the courage and mobility to respond to any situation.

The Doberman is a dog that comes with a built in high energy level and watching this short backed galloper run free (flat out with four off the floor) along the beach, in a field, or through the mountains has left many owners explaining what they see by describing the gracefulness, speed and beauty of a deer.

NOTE: Caution - be VERY careful with your Doberman during hunting season!!

Even though the Doberman was originally bred as a guardian and personal protector, the Doberman has an excellent nose for tracking and has been used for capturing felons. For many years the Doberman has been chosen to become an outstanding member of Search and Rescue Teams. A few owners have been surprised by the pointing and retrieving instincts of the Dobe and have made excellent hunting companions out of their pets. Dobes can also be found herding sheep (one such Dobe even has a Herding Dog Certificate) and bringing the cows in at milking time. The Dobermans loyalty, devotion, confidence and high degree of trainability (in the right hands) made the Doberman the dog of choice by the USMC during WWII; giving his life for his country. In contrast, this same breed has been and is still being used as a guide dog as well as an outstanding therapy dog.

The Doberman is one of the smartest dogs of dogdom. He is known for his intelligence and his uncanny reasoning ability. These qualities combined with the Dobe's deceptive power, exuberance for life, and his simple yet complex nature and temperament require extra time for early socialization, obedience training, and ample exercise. The Doberman is not recommended for dog owners of limited time, energy, and experience.

On the other hand, the Doberman is extremely affectionate and has been able to find his way into the hearts of his owners, like no other breed, and many people are life long devotes of this magnificent "Cadillac" of dogs.
CHARACTERISTICS

Ask a any Doberman owner and they will tell you a Doberman is a character with character. Look into those dark dancing eyes and you just know the Dobe is off to satisfy his curiosity. Investigating every tree and rock. Letting every blade of grass reveal it's "secrets" to a very fine tuned nose; alert for any movement (a squirrel, a lizard, a butterfly) that will provide a chase. Returning, perhaps with a grin, letting you know how fortunate you are to be "protected" by such a fine companion/guardian.

NOTE: Dobe pups have a propensity to put "everything" in their mouths. Be sure to clear the yard/floor before letting a puppy out/down to play.

Caution also needs to be taken if your Dobe will be encountering other dogs. With proper introductions (back to the early socialization and training) some Dobes will enjoy playing with other dogs. Other Dobes are not at all social.

NOTE: Male Dobermans are known to be territorial and normally WILL NOT accept other males in any situation...i.e. living with another male or meeting another male.

Look into the soft loving eyes of a Dobe, read what he is saying...You are being told you are the center of this dog's world. He will match your emotions, takes direction from your acceptance or non-acceptance of a situation. If he perceives there is "something wrong with this picture" or senses your fear he comes to attention - the eyes change - ready to meet the challenge.

NOTE: The instinct to protect is natural (i.e. early socialization will NOT undermine this trait), and further "guard dog" training is not necessary. A prospective Doberman owner being advised to forego early socialization, puppy kindergarten, and obedience training to produce a protective Dobe is being ILL ADVISED!

Living outside in a kennel or expected to stay in the backyard without constant attention and in a position as an important member of the family causes a host of problems with a Doberman. Often a Dobe that is relegated to this type of living arrangement goes hand in hand with poor training and these Dobes often show evidences of shyness, fear, and nervousness.

NOTE: As with any breed there will be dogs that exhibit these traits even when the breeding/training are correctly administered.

Dobes are people dogs -- showing an extraordinary devotion to their family or owner. A Dobe is very happy to settle down once inside (providing he has had time to exercise) to share your home, your bed (takes it over), and your food. It is also very normal for your Dobe to smile, lean on you, bump your hand for more attention, and follow you from room to room. For these reasons, Dobes are often referred to as "Velcro" dogs and one of the advantages of such a dog is; you never have to go to the bathroom alone again!

The Doberman is no different in their reactions to children than any other breed of dog. Interaction with children when the Doberman is a puppy often enables the dog to develop a strong loving bond with the child and family. There are also stories of rescued and older dogs adapting well to children. HOWEVER, as with any dog, ANY BREED, it is advisable NOT to leave dogs and small children unsupervised.

When faced with sickness, Dobermans can be quite stoic, concealing their pain long before you know something is wrong. A healthy Doberman comes to you, or moves around in the yard, with a special little trot, while a sick Dobe does more walking or plodding, perhaps holding its head and neck level or down. Some Dobes curl up and don't want to move. Their eyes are sometimes sad and almost soul searching.

Depending on the illness, some Dobes don't eat and may pace or move from one spot to another, restless and panting. Others may stretch a lot or try unsuccessfully to urinate. Dobes have been known to swallow items that can block the digestive track. If this is the case, your Dobe may not want to eat, or if he does eat, he will throw up, and pace and stretch again. Check with your vet if your Dobe shows any of these symptoms.

The hardest part of owning a Dobe is to be confronted with evidence of his mortality, that a loyal companion may no longer be there. It is then that you are faced with your only disappointment in owning a Dobe - the loss of your loved one. "It is then in these hours ... that he will best be able to face this difficult time, if he looks to the demeanor of his Dobe ... for it is their distinction that they squarely face adversity, not unlike that of a professional soldier." (anonymous)
TEMPERAMENT
In the Early Days, 100 years ago...

Early records tell us that the Doberman in Germany was a dog used by men as a guard dog. A dog that was alert, fearless, aggressive, intelligent, and trainable. The dogs were described as being "sharp" and became very popular as a police and watch dog. This type of temperament may have been accepted and desired in the rural settings of the past, but certainly not a temperament or dog that could survive in the urban society of today.
The Doberman of Today...

During the past 100 years the committed Doberman breeder has been able to produce a much milder/steadier disposition than the earlier dogs exhibited. Upon close examination, the breed is found in a variety of working positions as well as being an excellent dog for competition performances, the conformation ring, and a devoted family dog/clown/couch potato.
Questions about the Doberman Temperament

Quoted below are the two issues of temperament discussed in the AKC Standard for the Doberman. These areas are shyness and aggression. Either, if improperly displayed, will result in the Doberman being disqualified or excused from the ring.

"The judge shall dismiss from the ring any shy or vicious Doberman."

Shyness - A dog shall be judged fundamentally shy if, refusing to stand for examination, it shrinks away from the judge; if it fears an approach from the rear; if it shies at sudden and unusual noises to a marked degree.

Viciousness - A dog that attacks or attempts to attack either the judge or its handler, is definitely vicious. An aggressive or belligerent attitude towards other dogs shall not be deemed viciousness."

cheers,
minglmy

(This post was edited by minglmy on Aug 13, 2005, 2:56 AM)


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 13, 2005, 5:54 AM


Views: 2281
Re: [minglmy] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Thanks for the infor, I am very familiar with Dobs but I think you have taken a wrong turn somewhere. The subject in hand is if one trains one dog to be able to pass for CGC to be able to get your dog license as per Subang new ruling, then you have to retrain to be a watch dog is just crazy.

Oh, by the way you need not get a working dog etc to be a guard dog you can litterally get one from a show line, it is how you train it. The challenge is greater the other way around. Only thing that is impossible is making a dog into a full biting dog when it is not.


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Aug 13, 2005, 6:52 AM


Views: 2269
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hi,

Well, I have definitely not taken any wrong turn anywhere for my reply was a direct reply to your post refering to " I do strongly feel everyone should think about this "obedience thing" before saying it is a good thing."

also on "I have a dob and now I have a problem, it does not go on guard mode anymore. She will bark when certain people suspicious walk pass but if that person approach her she would just stop and 'sus' the person out and very likely becomes friend so what on earth for having a doberman? "

One hand, you have yr opinion and I have mine... just that our opinion does not cross at the junction that's all. A box also have 4 sides to look at so is a situation when ppl implement on the CGC/Obedience training. There bound to be ppl who agrees to the CGC test and also some who doesn't either way, for me i see it as having less aggressive dogs around town is better for the community.

On the other hand, what is "going to" implement have lots of loop holes too so in time I'm sure things like these will be iron out.

Crazy or not... its a sooner or later thing.FYI, watch dog n guard dog is different. I have personally never heard of anyone teaching/training a watch dog. Maybe you would like to share with us how to train a watch dog.

Then I guess ur one of those who loves challenges as you got a friendly dobes and is training the dog to be a "guard" dog that is not in his temprement at all. Good luck and I hope you enjoy the training and I hope once u done it succesfully you will be able ot share the training tips with the rest of us who might like to go with the challenge too.

cheers,
minglmy


Gus-Gus
Canine Addict

Aug 13, 2005, 10:15 AM


Views: 2259
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

I wanted to add a few points to this post.

PSY - While I understand your concern about your doberman being too friendly to stangers, do not underestimate your dog's loyalty to you in the face of adversity. Your dog may seem friendly to all people to you but if someone who is apparently a friend were to draw up in a van in the middle of the night and try and break in, I doubt if your dog will just sit still and watch. Dogs understand vibes and will sense when a "friend" is not acting in a "friendly" way. As for your friend's doberman that did not react when the family was robbed, I would like to clarify - robbed or burgled? A robbery is when the thief is violent and threatens the victim(s). A burglary is when there is a break-in but no direct confrontation between the thief and the victim(s). In either instance, it is possible for the dog to have been drugged to make it compliant and unable to respond.

Too many people expect their dogs to be on the frontline of security and place their dogs in jeopardy unnecessarily. No one who is truly security conscious would let their guard dog be a position to be rendered useless. A potential intruder can easily walk past a house and poison/ dope a dog with tainted meat, wait for the drug to work then enter the house silently. It is far more effective if the dog is kept indoors, safe from harm but able to alert the household if they hear something.

I would like to mention that all because a dog is obedient and well-socialised with humans it doesn't mean it's instincts as a dog are dormant. Dogs have a natural instinct to guard and protect their territory and their family. A dog that is normally docile will not necessarily remain so if they felt their family was being threatened. I know this personal experience. My GSD was friendly and sociable with my family - he tolerated rough handling and was generally obedient. But if anyone of them shouted at me or made gestures that he interpreted as being hostile or physically threatening to me, he would get come (from where ever he was in the house), place himself between the person and me crouch his body and growl, heckles raised. He would remain in that stance until that person walked away or adjusted their body language to something less threatening. Within minutes, he will have returned to his friendly self with that family member. He was never trained as a guard dog or a protection dog but he was taught basic obedience.

My dogs (the various breeds I have had over the years) have all barked at people at the door, whether they are total strangers or visitors who have come before. When the visitors are at the door, my dogs would bark at them but once they are allowed in by a family member, the dogs would be perfectly friendly until the next time when the visitor is again outside the door. My dogs have never let a visitor come in unless they are let in by us no matter how many times they may have visited. This behaviour has been displayed by all my dogs whether they were show dogs, schutzhund-trained or pets.

There appears to be a total misunderstanding about the purpose of the Canine Good Citizen course. It is not to make a dog docile or remove it's protective instinct. It's purpose is to ensure that a dog is controllable by it's owner, handle-able and most importantly, able to understand basic commands. It is also to ensure that dog owners know how to handle their dogs and most importantly - that the dog is accustomed to receiving and responding to commands. This is something ALL dogs should know whatever their purpose. The unfortunate thing is that many dog owners don't know/ care about the importance of any training. A dog may be strictly a pet but even a pet will attack if a situation arises. Whatever the circumstances leading to a dog attacking someone, a dog that is trained with basic obedience can be brought under control more easily because they are more accustomed to being given commands and responding.

What concerns me about the Canine Good Citizen course is how this would be handled. Who goes for the training with the dog? What is there to compel dog owners to go with their dogs rather than sending the maid or someone else? I sincerely doubt if the "boss" would allow the maid to discipline the dog when they don't even give the maid any authority over the children when they are badly behaved. How is the dog to obey the handler at training when the dog knows that the handler has no real authority at home???

Like a lot of "great Malaysian ideas", this one is flawed and needs a lot more thinking through before being implemented. I suspect this, like all those other "great ideas" will be implemented then withdrawn because there are too many problems to maintain the programme.

The idea for Canine Good Citizen is good but don't confuse poor programme implementation and management with CGC being a bad idea.


"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated" Mahatma Ghandi.


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 13, 2005, 7:39 PM


Views: 2239
Re: [minglmy] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Thanks for your response, appreciate your thoughts and views. A watch dog to me is one that would bark when starngers approach the house and would not entertain a friendly approach through the gate. A guard dog is one that would attack, may bark or it may not but certainly growl.

To make a well tempered dog aggressive or to become a guard dog, all you need to do is if you can hit it long enough whereby it has to protect itself it will be a good guard dog. However changing a dog back is another story to apoint it is impossible. My idea and definition of a watch and guard dog.

Again, thanks for your views.


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 13, 2005, 7:49 PM


Views: 2224
Re: [Gus-Gus] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Thanks value your input, my point is it has happen to me, a burly indian chap walked into my house at 8:30 am everyone was home and my dob just sat and watch (well a watch dog I suppose) and not do anything. She does charges to the gate when people approach but this time nothing. I do assume the guy actually made friends with her when everyone is at work hence my question earlier.

Anyway, the guy left when we cursed at him but he has already taken my sisters purse under his shirt and I did not notice it for I would have him. So whatever one's expectation is or not, you just cannot afford to wait for the acid test and say "my dog is a great watch dog".


Gus-Gus
Canine Addict

Aug 13, 2005, 10:38 PM


Views: 2214
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)


In Reply To
To make a well tempered dog aggressive or to become a guard dog, all you need to do is if you can hit it long enough whereby it has to protect itself it will be a good guard dog.

I'd like to clarify your point here. Do you mean to say that to make your dog a guard dog you hit it continually?


"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated" Mahatma Ghandi.


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 14, 2005, 4:22 AM


Views: 2206
Re: [Gus-Gus] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hit means you agitate the dog until it retaliates not hit until to a point it is abuse.


Gus-Gus
Canine Addict

Aug 14, 2005, 6:39 AM


Views: 2198
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hitting your dog for no reason that he can fathom IS abuse. It is a shocking and disgusting way to treat your dog. That is not the way to train a dog to be a watch dog and it is certainly not any acceptable method taught by any reputable dog trainer.

I don't know how you came by that idea that that is how a dog is trained to be a guard dog. That is the way to make a dog psychotic, unpredictable and definitely dangerous to others. Hitting your dog for no reason other than to make it retaliate is called TORMENTING your dog. It will make your dog scared of humans. No wonder when a big Indian man walked up to your gate your dog just sat there and watched. Undoubtedly, your dog thought it safer to stay out of his way than to get in his way and make himself the target of a beating - either from him or from you. Your dog has no idea what you want from him since you hit him without reason.

Your dog is not friendly or docile - it is nervous and scared. Scared and nervous dogs are dangerous because they will react from fear. That fear is what will one day make your dog attack someone without provocation. Your dog will never bite someone to protect you. It is far more likely to "snap" mentally and bite someone whom the dog views as an easy target to vent his fear on -which is usually a child. The killer instinct in the dog makes it able to assess the feeblest, the weakest and the least able to protect themselves. One move that the dog views as being threatening (usually the wave of an arm since that is the prelude to being hit) and your dog will do what he has to do to protect himself.

I have been involved with dog training all my life and I have never come across such a cock-eyed way of thinking. No wonder you're not keen on CGC - the way you treat your dog, you'd be found out and probably arrested and tried in court for animal abuse.

ANY dog has a natural instinct to want to guard and protect those who love them and that the dog loves back. Your dog may well prefer you dead since the way you treat him has nothing to do with love. Consider this - what incentive does your dog have to guard and protect you when you hit him for no reason? If you were dead, the beatings would end.

I had no thought before in favour or against CGC but after this unbelieveable insight into your insane thinking, I think it should introduced to every municipality. Furthermore, it should be included in the school syllabus in Malaysian school to teach Malaysian children what is the proper way to behave toward dogs and what is cruelty so that they can report people like you who clearly have no idea.

PSY, I started my participation in this thread because I though the other participants might have misunderstood you but I realise now I was mistaken - you have no idea what you're talking about. YOU need to attend a course on how to treat your dog.


"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated" Mahatma Ghandi.

(This post was edited by Gus-Gus on Aug 14, 2005, 6:44 AM)


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 14, 2005, 7:25 AM


Views: 2184
Re: [Gus-Gus] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Nevermind, you are very likely to be correct and I probably need to refer to an expert when it comes to dogs, thanks for your time, oh , do check out some write up on schuus training.


PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 15, 2005, 1:28 AM


Views: 2172
Re: [Gus-Gus] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Just like to add to my earlier reply, please note my 10th August thread whereby I mentioned I have a problem so your views plus offence certainly do not help, (you know "shut down" must have experience this since your are a dog trainer) try reading and understanding before you come over strongly with your views.


RealityDreamer
Doggyman


Aug 15, 2005, 2:48 AM


Views: 2170
Re: [Gus-Gus] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

" I don't know how you came by that idea that that is how a dog is trained to be a guard dog. That is the way to make a dog psychotic, unpredictable and definitely dangerous to others. Hitting your dog for no reason other than to make it retaliate is called TORMENTING your dog."

I do not agree that that method would be suitable..."hitting for no reason" but the reason here is to teach the dog that he can be in danger and it is to condition him that in real life, he will get hit by intruders. Don't tell me a robber would not try to hit the dog if he were to be attacked. If you're lucky,he is unarmed & only has his fists.

In general, nervous & scared dogs will obviously react in fear BUT strong nerved,confident,civil & sound temperament dogs will retaliate simply because they are defensive. A nervous & scared dog have problems discriminating & hv very low thresholds. What is harmless to us may seem a huge deal to him. That I am sure u noe.

Now,definition of a GOOD PERSONAL PROTECTION DOG. He should not react without a 3rd party doing so first and will protect the owner no matter what even if it means biting the person to do so. So yes,a dog will bite to protect. For this he needs to be extremely confident with very stable nerves & very clear in the head. During training,they do hit the dog but not for him to retaliate because he has already reacted to the 3rd party. By the time they hit the dog,he is already on the person's arm. the hitting as I hv mentioned before is to condition him.

"ANY dog has a natural instinct to want to guard and protect those who love them and that the dog loves back." I used to have that dream till I got involved with working dogs. I can surely tell u that if that is your way of telling how much your dogs love you,then 90% of the dogs in this country don't love their owners very much. Is that true? No. It simply means that they have weak nerves. When push comes to shove,unless your dog is trained & has suitable genetics,self preservation comes first.

Anyway,I hv gone way off course. I do not support hitting dogs for no reason but just to explain what "hitting a dog" is for when training a protection dog.
,-._,-.
\/)"(\/
(_o_)



RealityDreamer
Doggyman


Aug 15, 2005, 3:16 AM


Views: 2167
Re: [Gus-Gus] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

"I would like to clarify - robbed or burgled? A robbery is when the thief is violent and threatens the victim(s). A burglary is when there is a break-in but no direct confrontation between the thief and the victim(s). "

Either way, a good guard dog should react. IMO,bitten any intruder.

"A potential intruder can easily walk past a house and poison/ dope a dog with tainted meat, wait for the drug to work then enter the house silently". Good guard dogs are poison proofed.

" My GSD was friendly and sociable with my family - he tolerated rough handling and was generally obedient. But if anyone of them shouted at me or made gestures that he interpreted as being hostile or physically threatening to me, he would get come (from where ever he was in the house), place himself between the person and me crouch his body and growl, heckles raised."

I agree,most dogs do have that natural instinct. It is just that the divide between working line & show line is so wide. Just because your dog is a rott,gsd,dobe,malinois,boxer does not equate to a good guard dog. Most dogs react to smth that is strange/threatening,just that maybe that dobe is just plain friendly,the gene/instinct to be defensive/civil was diluted.

Hackles raised-that is the most obvious sign that the dog is insecure,therefore needs to raise his hackles to look bigger in order to intimidate the threat.

"My dogs (the various breeds I have had over the years) have all barked at people at the door, whether they are total strangers or visitors who have come before." Is that your definition of watch dog..or guard dog?

"My dogs have never let a visitor come in unless they are let in by us no matter how many times they may have visited. This behaviour has been displayed by all my dogs whether they were show dogs, schutzhund-trained or pets."

Let me clarify this. Schutzhund dogs are NOT protection dogs. Schutzhund is a sport where the environment is controlled. Protection is real life where everything is unpredictable. Also,some SchH dogs have such a high threshold u can literally jump in,break into the hse n maybe make friends with the dog or heck bring the dog with u . A good guard dog would not let u step into his home.

"There appears to be a total misunderstanding about the purpose of the Canine Good Citizen course. It is not to make a dog docile or remove it's protective instinct. It's purpose is to ensure that a dog is controllable by it's owner, handle-able and most importantly, able to understand basic commands. It is also to ensure that dog owners know how to handle their dogs and most importantly - that the dog is accustomed to receiving and responding to commands. This is something ALL dogs should know whatever their purpose. The unfortunate thing is that many dog owners don't know/ care about the importance of any training."

That I 100% agree. To own a dog,it is the owners responsibility to control the dog no matter the circumstance. But there are nervous/difficult dogs around but for this I do not blame the owners if they have tried & made an effort.
,-._,-.
\/)"(\/
(_o_)



RealityDreamer
Doggyman


Aug 15, 2005, 3:26 AM


Views: 2166
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

"you need not get a working dog etc to be a guard dog you can litterally get one from a show line, it is how you train it. The challenge is greater the other way around. Only thing that is impossible is making a dog into a full biting dog when it is not."

Very well said,though I have made the comment abt the divide in an earlier post,it is what the dog is made of that matters. If you can get a stable,strong nerved,clear in the head,civil dog frm show lines,then he can definitely be a protection dog. It is only that working lines are preferred because the chances of getting a dog like that is higher than getting one frm showlines.

Also, a good guard dog to me is 1 that stops at nth to defend his owner,biting included.
,-._,-.
\/)"(\/
(_o_)



RealityDreamer
Doggyman


Aug 15, 2005, 3:49 AM


Views: 2160
Re: [PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

PSY,
That is not the way GOOD guard dogs are trained...that is unfortunately how most of the guard dogs are trianed though.
Also your comment on your dobe, I am afraid the "divide between working line & showline" reality applies here.
The other thing I want to add abt show line vs working line is that IF your dogs are purely from american lines where there is no working titles needed in order to breed,then chances are lower to get a good PP prospect. The German show lines however do need a minimum requirement of a Sch 1 title if they want to breed tht particular dog & if I am not mistaken show them at a higher level as well.
,-._,-.
\/)"(\/
(_o_)



RealityDreamer
Doggyman


Aug 15, 2005, 4:38 AM


Views: 2153
Re: [JoeSmith,PSY] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

MKA is only the certifying body. Training can be done privately. Also,there's already so much "hanky-panky" going on in the dog world or heck M'sia..This is just another on the list.

Joe,

*Apparently* pups are exempted.

I also worry abt my dog. He will definitely react to the umbrella...but I guess it might help with lots of conditioning.

To me,the CGC is a better alternative than simply banning dogs.
,-._,-.
\/)"(\/
(_o_)



PSY
K9 Kaki


Aug 15, 2005, 5:40 AM


Views: 2140
Re: [RealityDreamer] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Thank-you for your views at least now I know I am not totally daft about dogs, a little maybe.


RealityDreamer
Doggyman


Aug 15, 2005, 5:51 AM


Views: 2133
Re: [chrisong] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Tht's 1 difference between a well bred & trained guard dog and a nervous fearful dog.
,-._,-.
\/)"(\/
(_o_)



JoeSmith
K9 Maniac


Aug 15, 2005, 6:38 PM


Views: 2120
Re: [RealityDreamer] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

My dog should protect my house and my family, especially when I am out for work. If he would make friends with any Tom, Dick and Harry then what is the point in having a guard dog? If he takes food from them, no use either.



I don’t like that this new rule is made to support and protect thief and robber instead of family and home.

I have nothing against putting some pressure on dog owners to be more responsible, to be able to control the dog and to know about the breed they own.

e.g. I can walk with my dog thru a crowd, as we have done in Bangsar, without having to worry about my dog, even if people start screaming.

However, the moment anyone tries to touch me, that is a different story and that is what I love about my dog.

I know that I am taking a risk with that, but I need that my dog protects the house and that means that I am fully responsible for any attack on a stranger. I can live with that, actually, I sleep much better at night.BTW, my dog would bark and growl and would try to intimidate any intruder to make him to retreat. If nothing works then, and only then, it might attack and bite.


leecy
Ultra ALPHA


Aug 22, 2005, 10:46 PM


Views: 2073
Re: [RealityDreamer] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

RealityDreamer

I have gone through all ur postings in this thread, & sincerely i really admire you, both your knowledge & firm standing. (sorry my eng not that good as im still a young learner.)

when i get into this forum i noticed & feel very uncomfortable when there are ppl, many of them indeed who just PICK UP certain words posted by ppl & tend to criticise until out of topic & even conclude others.

some feel that they know EVERYTHING & speak as if they are very sure while they are not. there are ppl who just wish to have their say but NEVER listen to what others say.

well i think im out of topic here but just wish to express my feeling here that im glad there are still ppl like u. i always believe although we have different point of views, we can discuss thus we learn. i discourage ppl to view those who oppose their views to be their enemy.

in short, i wish there are more positive discussions like urs which have a clear standing, not PERSONAL attacks used by certain group of ppl.

last but not least, may i know more abt you? besides this training thingy do u know more about others? I am very interested in this dog issues BUT i cant find any suitable ones to discuss with. maybe i am as what chrisong said: " you are a person who is so irritating, want to vomit to discuss with u"

the main problem i met is when i intend to discuss abt certain topic, there are certain ppl act like what i mention above, so NO healthy discussion can continue.

hope i can learn lots of things from u if u dont mind, i got lots of ques in mind, but i wonder wether u are free to reply. hey man, this posting seems weird to be posted here.. but im that type of person who simply love to discuss & hate those who create huge disturbance.

just to drop by to compliments this type of healthy discussion, bye~




Regards,

Yang

(This post was edited by leecy on Aug 22, 2005, 10:51 PM)


chrisong
Doggyman

Aug 23, 2005, 5:58 AM


Views: 2049
Re: [leecy] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hey,

I take it positively from what you say about me from other post. That why I stop the discussion with you anymore from that tread and Now you talking bad about me from different tread. You no need to explain to other ppl that you are good other are bad.

It show how inmature you are.Unsure This is sad

Look what you write here. That is not a healthy message or discussion. Back-stab people. Did I do that? Got mouth say people no mouth say yourself.


leecy
Ultra ALPHA


Aug 23, 2005, 6:38 PM


Views: 2030
Re: [chrisong] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

please dont be so sensitive. this posting not meant to back stab u. bye.




Regards,

Yang


RealityDreamer
Doggyman


Aug 25, 2005, 3:25 AM


Views: 1991
Re: [leecy] New doggie law for Subang Jaya (and maybe others?)

Hello Leecy,
I hv to say I'm quite speechless & flattered. Nvr really had anyone admire me in that way b4.lol.

Ur english is fine & don't worry abt age. I'm also younger than what most ppl think.

When I meet ppl like that, I do not bother arguing because it will go no where. I noe my own point(i hv good reason to think so) & couldn't be bothered to prove it to ppl who are not willing to keep an open mind. If u do not keep an open mind & accept new ideas,u will nvr learn. If they are willing to question & maybe challenge without hostility then why not.

U cannot change their view. All u can say is "here is my opinion. if it makes sense to u & want to accept it,tht's fine. If not,tht's fine too." Just because they disagree does not make them wrong. It does not make u right either. It just means u both hv different opinions. That is that.

Another thing is, maybe they are sure. I am quite sure they hv their own reasons for thinking so. They must hv some reason to base their opinion on. As for chrisong,I do not know him personally but he has contributed to this forum,as many members hv.

Leecy, do not take what is said in the forum personally coz ppl don't noe u personally do they? Smile
,-._,-.
\/)"(\/
(_o_)



(This post was edited by Admin on Aug 25, 2005, 8:59 PM)