Home


  Main Index MAIN
INDEX 		FAQ FAQ & HELP FAQ PHOTO GALLERY Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE 		Log in LOG
IN

Home: Dog and Puppies Talk: Current Dog Related Issues and News:
Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam







minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Apr 27, 2005, 1:26 AM

Post #1 of 62 (5560 views)
Shortcut
Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam Can't Post
 metro.thestar.com.my/news/2005/4/10770662.html

Another one more ..... terrible for those who is staying under the Shah Alam (MPSA) jurisdiction. You guys have my condolences on this....

cheers,
minglmy


rocz
Member


Apr 27, 2005, 7:44 AM

Post #2 of 62 (5533 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Somehow i think it does make some sense...

At least pple who dont respect a dog will not simply keep a dog for fun...

Pple who really love dogs will dont mind the trouble....

Of course certain points like asking left right center conscent is a bit too taxing


khoo262
Enthusiast


Apr 27, 2005, 6:09 PM

Post #3 of 62 (5514 views)
Shortcut
Re: [rocz] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
They should also make a rule that before you rear a cat, you must ask left,right, centre consent too.



cats are also pets....
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


cordy
Member


Apr 27, 2005, 7:19 PM

Post #4 of 62 (5502 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
metro.thestar.com.my/news/2005/4/10770662.html

Another one more ..... terrible for those who is staying under the Shah Alam (MPSA) jurisdiction. You guys have my condolences on this....
hi minglmy,

I wonder what'll happened to the current *banned* doggies in Shah Alam since the owners are given the option to either "surrender them to Shah Alam City Council (MBSA) or get rid of the doggies themselves" when Jan 1 2006 comes? ( tdy's Malay Mail on pg 12)

what an ultimatum they given to the such breed owners! That they have to look for another home outside of Shah Alam area when next year comes. How about those who are not renting and had bought the house there?

What crime have the doggies done? Just becoz they have been born in certain, now deemed 2b *banned/dangerous* breed that da majority have to pay for the misdeeds of the few?? Frown

*Not so happy Cordy*


(This post was edited by cordy on Apr 27, 2005, 7:22 PM)


rocz
Member


Apr 28, 2005, 2:00 AM

Post #5 of 62 (5469 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Thats true...

Cats shd get the conscent

Coz my dogs will not simply go into other;s house....

BUT CATS WILL!!!!


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Apr 28, 2005, 5:50 PM

Post #6 of 62 (5449 views)
Shortcut
Re: [rocz, khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
the only discrimination here is the asking here there n everywhere for consent which not everyone have understanding or good neighbours some of us have bad relationship with our neighbours so that will cause some problem here.

cheers,
minglmy


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Apr 28, 2005, 5:57 PM

Post #7 of 62 (5439 views)
Shortcut
Re: [cordy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Hi Cordy,

You mean this article ? I missed yesterday's paper totally as I was on leave.

www.mmail.com.my/Current_News/MM/Wednesday/National/20050427111940/Article/index_html

“Dogs surrendered to us would be sent to the Dog Rehabilitation Centre in Subang Jaya,” he said.

blardy piece of shit this is. Ok, definitely will not move anywhere NEAR Shah Alam area when I look for a house of my own ! *%&#^&!!! WTF ! damn discrimination and they really gonna burn down a whole village because of 1 house. what kind of reasoning is that man....... *&Q#$(*7 !

cheers,
minglmy


shahida_w
Dog Kichi


Apr 28, 2005, 7:50 PM

Post #8 of 62 (5430 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
i think it has come to a point where we (certain) malaysians have gone back in time. The problem is, we have irresponsible pet owners who breed dogs solely on guarding basis. these dogs inturn are brainwashed to be aggresive. I do sympathize with people who were/are victmimized from these aggressors but what people need to understand is that ALL DOGS ARE NOT AGGRESSIVE unless treated like crap or are trained to be one. I have come across numeous pitbulls, dobermans, rotties whilst in the US and they are just as passive as friggin' worms! What makes me mad, the majority of staff that governs the country's legislative are all of MELAYU breed who are mostly ignorant and naive when it comes to dogs. for some reason dogs are of a taboo. what they have failed in their laws, are far more potent issues that are ACTUALLY happening in Malaysia which needs to be addressed ASAP-RAPE, police bribery, police incompetence etc... Dogs are the least they have to worry.

Being a Malay myself, i am disgusted by my race in this country who looks down at dogs like breeds from hell. But raping their children/grandchildren is actually a norm. is there justice?

My late granduncle is an Islamic scholar- he prays 5 times a days, loves his family, had 1 wife and dogs. he once told us, our Prophet Muhammad had dogs in his days.

Whatever happened to the true meaning of Islam-love all of God's creation?????


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Apr 28, 2005, 8:35 PM

Post #9 of 62 (5423 views)
Shortcut
Re: [shahida_w] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
irresponsible are really to be blame ! Some purposely train their dogs by putting fear in them so that they turn aggressive and in turn will be a good guard dog to their precious home. These people never think of the dog. They never realise the problem they have in creating an uncontrollable dog.

Yes, dog is the least of our government or MPXX/DBXX problem and they shd spend more time tackling other more useful things than talk abt the dogs. If they want, they should have find a better solution to curb the strays cats n dogs n also those SUPER BIG FAT RATS than anything.

Dogs I believe in the olden days are dirty and unhealthy n etc but nowdays... look around, some of the dogs and even mongrel at home are so healthy they are different from centuries ago.

cheers,
minglmy


kenken
Dog Kichi


Apr 28, 2005, 9:36 PM

Post #10 of 62 (5408 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Look at the way they handle the Bkit Cahaya case you know those fellows wanted to patch up things lah and dogs in SA is the scapegoat , anyway majority of the population there are muslims try that on PJ or Cheras area you will see alot of protest, how many of you guys in this forum is staying in SA maybe we can ask them what are the best solution to over come this, worst to worst sold off their furkids to other dogs lover people in other district lah.

I'm sure the price for rottweiler is dirt cheap now.Pirate


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Apr 28, 2005, 10:41 PM

Post #11 of 62 (5391 views)
Shortcut
Re: [kenken] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
got lots lar ...dont forget Kota Kemuning is chinese area but under MPSA district so ... u will get tons of dog owners staying at that area in trouble ...

cheers,
minglmy


khoo262
Enthusiast


Apr 28, 2005, 11:29 PM

Post #12 of 62 (5376 views)
Shortcut
Re: [rocz] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
at least your dog is restricted to a leash or the compound of your house. cats....they go everywhere. you name it. they can go there.. , drain, toilet, kitchen,etc. and they bury their poo. it's like a time bomb as you cannot see them. once you step on them. the smell will linger for days.
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


khoo262
Enthusiast


Apr 28, 2005, 11:34 PM

Post #13 of 62 (5375 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
You guys should get the NST dated 27th April 2005. Some donkey by the name of En Shahril wrote in asking to ban all dogs as he mention dogs are dangerous and it's in their blood to bite people. Make my blood boil.
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


khoo262
Enthusiast


Apr 28, 2005, 11:40 PM

Post #14 of 62 (5374 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
dog lovers,

please read the article by the donkey :

http://www.nst.com.my/.../Article/indexb_html
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


minglmy
Puppycom Veteran


Apr 29, 2005, 12:09 AM

Post #15 of 62 (5366 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
thank u for posting this up !

really making me boil ! blardy idiots ! ALL dogs ???? my god ... make me wanting to give him a slap right now !

cheers,
minglmy


kenken
Dog Kichi


Apr 29, 2005, 4:09 PM

Post #16 of 62 (5341 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Just ignore that fellow lah u think the GOV want to listen to only 1 fellow meh, went a person do good things no one will care but once make 1 mistake everyone will blame him.


ERN
K9 Maniac


Apr 29, 2005, 5:13 PM

Post #17 of 62 (5335 views)
Shortcut
Re: [kenken] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Just becasue of 1 dog bit their ppl then ban all dog.

So many bapa, datuk rape their duaghter/grand daughter, ask them potong semua their troublesome uncontrollable little black gadget lah. Wha is the point after do it that then wear the white head appear in the court!! Super hyper bloody stupid animal. Pig is much better behave.

Frown

View my photo album

last update, ZEUS & Shiki's 2nd off springs, 16/09/2008. Yes 9.16!

http://s56.photobucket.com/...%20Zeus%20N%20Shiki/

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/ERN2/Dogs


kenken
Dog Kichi


Apr 29, 2005, 7:41 PM

Post #18 of 62 (5319 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ERN] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
WOW...cool down lah Smile, like i say its just a show only after much heated up issues on XXXXX if i'm not mistaken this rules has been in place long ago in SA drawer gather dust, the rottweiler that bitten the boy MPxx also not enforcing any rules on this mah, worst come to worst send them to their relatives lor.


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


Apr 29, 2005, 9:34 PM

Post #19 of 62 (5312 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
i read about the ban in Shah Alam..
I think they are looking for a instant solution.
I mean baning the breed rottie in that area is unacceptable. Cuz i think rottie is one of the fav breed in Malaysia. Some more..this solution only create more porblem like by 2006,
1. More Rottie roaming as stray in the street. Why? who wan to keep if malaysia keep on sending the wrong information on this breed?
2. Ppl from other world think we are selfish, dog like rottie also cannot live with, how to live with other species in the world.

Simply i think alot of malaysian is still very shallow thinker.

Find solution that work not create more problem

Malaysian need to be re-educate and re-learn about becoming a RESPONSIBLE OWNER..do not blame it on the animal.

Like everyone said
There is no such thing as bad dog only bad owner.

Peace and sign out

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu

(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414
http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


khoo262
Enthusiast


Apr 29, 2005, 11:41 PM

Post #20 of 62 (5292 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
yesterday i send an e-mail to the editor of NST. I just mention all the good thing a dog can do such as guard dog, police dog, guide dog for the disable,etc. And i ask what can a cat do????

wonder if they will put up my mail????
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


ERN
K9 Maniac


Apr 30, 2005, 12:51 AM

Post #21 of 62 (5281 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
For the boy's case, they just published the incident the dog bit the boy, but none of them give further detail. I am sure everybody will ask, why the dog bit him?

So, sure your mail will not see the sun light.

THey have this cuture, throw stone at the bad thing/ppl, like ppl who denouced islam, dog is bad so they stone. THis has been instiled in their mind from the day they receive education.

I saw one malay guy, not only trow stone, he even purposely ram the dog when he drove by, many times and one time he succeeded. the poor dog with serious injury on his head was never seen after few days. The dog is belong to one of his neighbour.

Did you guy know they will receive "bonus" (in heaven ?) for every house lizard they killed? Ask you muslim friends.

Frown

View my photo album

last update, ZEUS & Shiki's 2nd off springs, 16/09/2008. Yes 9.16!

http://s56.photobucket.com/...%20Zeus%20N%20Shiki/

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/ERN2/Dogs


(This post was edited by ERN on Apr 30, 2005, 12:54 AM)


tterrynick
Enthusiast


Apr 30, 2005, 4:58 AM

Post #22 of 62 (5269 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ERN] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
guys, relax, the dateline is 1 jan 2006. by the time comes, everything is forgotten and there will be ways of getting around all these restrictions (if you know what i mean...) the bl**dy newspapers would have picked up some other news to sell their newspapers, like stoopid datuk singer in jail, stoopid pretty singer is a witness in court, like those are the most important things happening here in malaysia.

as for the crazy fella who wrote to the nst to ban all dogs, to him i say 'GO TO HELL'. my doggies give me unconditional love. and i give them back all my love.

if banning all dogs is the way to stop dog violence, then i suppose we have to kill all men, because some of them beat their wives and rape their daughters. kill all women, because they abuse their indonesian maids. then what do we have left, no more humans. i just cannot understand the narrow-mindedness there are in certain people.

there are good muslims who understand god's beautiful creations. i have seen a malay school bus driver who comes everyday with food to feed a family of strays in my neighbourhood. that man has my respect.

fatty lingling (left) and petite tutu (right), protected by handsome nicky at the back - my 3 precious babies.
now i have 4 babies but baby adek just cannot stay still for a photo-shoot!!


khoo262
Enthusiast


Apr 30, 2005, 6:02 PM

Post #23 of 62 (5262 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ERN] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
so sad to say that this is true. dogs are under enemies of the religion and if you get rid of them, their god will reward them. if they get killed in a battle with some dogs, it's actually mati jihad (die in holy war).......stupid.....
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


mun2
Enthusiast


Apr 30, 2005, 10:34 PM

Post #24 of 62 (5249 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
so sad to say that this is true. dogs are under enemies of the religion and if you get rid of them, their god will reward them. if they get killed in a battle with some dogs, it's actually mati jihad (die in holy war).......stupid.....

to all,

like u guys when i saw the news i was shocked... because of one incident they are going to ban some certain types of dogs they deemed 'dangerous'?? doesnt make sense..

according to one of my frens there is this news in the newspaper about an indian boy being bitten by a dog .. and its not at the front page.. AND they mentioned that the boy disturb the dog first..

is this fair?????? what's the deal with dogs and malays?? can anyone answer me??? did dogs do sumting bad to malays??

having said that.. not all malays are bad... but just majority Frown

another concern is that will the MPSA ruling be adopted by other MPxx??

http://www.dogster.com/?139719


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


May 1, 2005, 7:52 AM

Post #25 of 62 (5233 views)
Shortcut
Re: [mun2] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
what i heard from my malays friend is the reason they are not allow to any connection wiith dog was because an incident happen the past, there are this disease a dog carry which now was confirmed as *rabies* has attack one of their holy priest and he died and some where some how he pass on the disease and alot of their ppl die before it stop so they believe god sent the dog with that disease to punish them for their sin..that one is told by a friend..not so sure how true is it..

at the end..what they annouce now is going to be a huge and create more porblem in the future..i can bet on that...

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu

(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414
http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 3, 2005, 5:55 PM

Post #26 of 62 (2394 views)
Shortcut
Re: [nicky_spykeaz] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
I think they should banned chicken next and all cannot eat chicken...because chicken bought chicken flu...next on the list is cow....because cow bought mad cow disease...anything else that we can ban. if you follow their religion strictly...their people not even suppose to play guitar...yet you see their people in illegal motorbike races (which our DBKL/police will not interfere as it is their people), riots, buring flags,etc.
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


Leeann
Novice

May 3, 2005, 6:50 PM

Post #27 of 62 (2384 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
ha!ha! yeah, i totally agree with u. while we're at it, why don't they ban humans as well. news like parents killing their own children and vice versa are quite common nowadays. just b'cos they're humans, they deserve to live longer is it? stupid logic...... what is the meaning of democracy if u are not even to allowed to rear dogs in your own house. must get permission from neighbours, local council and some other stupid people who might not know the slightest bit about dogs...... so sad....... maybe can let the whole world see how shallow, stupid and dictatorial some malaysians are........ democratic my a#$.......

"Dream of owning a personal animal shelter"


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 3, 2005, 9:33 PM

Post #28 of 62 (2376 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Leeann] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
And I wonder why grandfather/father rape daughter always happen to their people.
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


alicia
Enthusiast

May 4, 2005, 4:39 AM

Post #29 of 62 (2356 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
i wonder too. i did think about it but i would never really dare to say something like that. i guess i'm not the only person who thinks it though.
Alicia Ling Horsley


petepicure.wordpress.com/
pinkpetfood.blogspot.com/

"The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality."Dante


CHRISCYK
Novice

May 4, 2005, 6:46 AM

Post #30 of 62 (2347 views)
Shortcut
Re: [kenken] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
my my ask the neighbours for permission for renewal of licences what a stupid thing to do.
100% the Malay neighbour definitely will not sign the letter so my poor dog will not get her licence renewed then what will happen to precious doggy.
The last time i was keeping a cocker spaniel in my compound and one day i received a notice from MPXX for complaints filed by my neighbour. I asked MPXX what was the problem and they informed me that they complained about the barking and the shit smell. I asked MPXX which dog don bark when they see stranger and I can't be sitting the whole day in the house waiting for the dog to do her business becoz I clean my compound early in the morning b4 I go to work. My children told me that one day they noticed that he even wacked a poor dog which happen to go into their house half dead. Poor doggy.
My poor doggy died of food poisoning and i am sure they must have thrown something to my dog to eat becoz my other neighbour told me that when we are not around they will shout at my dog. I can just imagine how u expect me to get written permission from this inhuman idiots for renewal of licence for now I am having a miniature snauzher which I am keeping in the house and not letting her out of the house which I think my dog life is more luxurious than them.
I really think it is rediculous for the MPXX to impose such rules for getting a licence for a dog. Ppl will think twice in getting a licence. Anyway ppl should be careful and responsible when keeping the fierce dogs. Well if u don disturb the dogs I don think the dogs will bite u becoz dogs also know who are bad and good. If u are kind and nice to the dogs they will definitely be nice to u. If u keep on disturbing them they will surely keep u in memory and take revenge on u one day. Sometime just don look and listen to one side of the story see both sides and only comment. One thing happen then make an issue of things.
I fully agree if want to set rules for dogs then also set rules for cats. They are also nuisance. Shit everywhere and breed even under my bed !!!!!!!! My goodness. Dogs will listen not like cats which are more fierce than dogs.
So staying in Shah Alam no dog lovers. FrownFrownFrown


(This post was edited by CHRISCYK on May 4, 2005, 7:40 AM)


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 4, 2005, 11:38 PM

Post #31 of 62 (2304 views)
Shortcut
Re: [CHRISCYK] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
I think you should rear pigs. currently they don't require any license to rear a pet pig. then see how pissed off your neighbour is....
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


May 5, 2005, 6:50 PM

Post #32 of 62 (2281 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
true true..
maybe one day we should have three to four pig as a pet..drive our friend mad shoot up the skies..

This ban will not last, i assume cuz it darn bloddy stupid piece of idea that come up by a bunch of brainless human...

sorry to be rude cuz me darn mad

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu

(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414
http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 6, 2005, 1:02 AM

Post #33 of 62 (2259 views)
Shortcut
Re: [nicky_spykeaz] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
haha good one!!
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


May 6, 2005, 3:17 AM

Post #34 of 62 (2248 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
trust me no chinese will move to Shah Alam area cuz it is official know as the malay region..unless you change your mind and you in love with cat and our friend in shah alam...plz do move but i sure wont go to your house warm event for sure Tongue

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu

(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414
http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


ianlim
Dog Kichi


May 6, 2005, 9:39 AM

Post #35 of 62 (2234 views)
Shortcut
Re: [nicky_spykeaz] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
"Currently, only those staying in terrace house corner lots and bungalows are allowed to keep dogs. " WTF!!??Mad

My family rent in an intermmediate unit with ROCKY.. Luckly, we r not in SA, esle, ROCKY will be gone with the wind.. Pirate

I feel so sorry for the dog owners at SA which are badly victimised.. Now, i am worry that, the strict rules would be apply in other areas in the future..

I say we should together write a formal letter, and sign it, pass it to MPSA.. Also, an online petition, emails them, call them up, writes to all the medias, including tv stations about our rights...!! Let them hear us and respect us..!!

Ian


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


May 6, 2005, 4:10 PM

Post #36 of 62 (2219 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ianlim] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
like everyone will obey the ruke lah..only corner house....my a** is show to them...
no one will care cuz if the government go overboard..they will get it from their citizen...we will the next japan vs china war...but in our case was dog owner vs *our friend*

Trust me sooner or later, the problem will come...ppl will shoot at them..Mad

my malay friend in MPSA already sound his opinion to the authority...wonder they heard him or not..

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu

(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414
http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


kenken
Dog Kichi


May 6, 2005, 8:14 PM

Post #37 of 62 (2182 views)
Shortcut
Re: [nicky_spykeaz] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
It won't happen in other area other than SA, i think 2 days back the article from The Star on special training for dogs before approve license is a good move after all and u know in Harian Metro mention 2 dogs for 1 house with 1000 p.s.f area and what SA mention was just to scare us dogs lovers only lets wait and see what is the outcome of the guideline.




nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


May 6, 2005, 8:29 PM

Post #38 of 62 (2177 views)
Shortcut
Re: [kenken] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
me totally agree with the move..
i did read what star printed yesterday...to some sound bullshit..but to me is a great move..at least can educate further and current dog owner to be more responsible on their pet and be extra careful while handling them..they is no such thing is too careful Smile

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu

(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414
http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 9, 2005, 6:15 PM

Post #39 of 62 (2135 views)
Shortcut
Re: [nicky_spykeaz] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
I heard that there is an association from SA collecting signatures to banned dogs as pet. What's worse...the president is a chinese!! Maybe in the past life, he is a cat.....
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


ERN
K9 Maniac


May 9, 2005, 10:55 PM

Post #40 of 62 (2122 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
This guy [that association chairman and the Anti-Dog Assocication in Kepong/JinJang] is the Servile Follower, a "Chow Kow" running dog, running away from dog. They are not only run away from our loyal friends but also they re running away from their ancestor.

Shame on you this type of people, sell your soul, sell your granfather's surname for your immdiate benefits.

In another case not related to Dog, A developer in Kepong is sueing a temple commitee for million of ringgit for not relocate the temple for their development. If that is a mosque instead, they will not do it and they may built the road for them somemore!! .THis type of incidemt will only happen to Chinese, Why..????

Why Chinese got so many "Chow Kaw"??? Shame!

I dont like to rear cat, Does not meant I hate cat and want to kill all the cat!! There is this type of belief that banned dog and try to kill all the dogs. If they believe this world including the beatiful dogs is created by their Almighty, why they still want to kill other creature of the same Almighty?? They betrayed their own belief!!

Frown

View my photo album

last update, ZEUS & Shiki's 2nd off springs, 16/09/2008. Yes 9.16!

http://s56.photobucket.com/...%20Zeus%20N%20Shiki/

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/ERN2/Dogs


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


May 10, 2005, 5:24 AM

Post #41 of 62 (2100 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
dont worry..banning a dog will not happen in Malaysia only more rule and regulation will set up...even the dept of vet mention in paper today, Malay Mail state that "those authority" planning to ban dog should get better solution from other party such as dog owner..a better solution can be made...trust me, the governemnt do not want agree dog lover running their office to complain all the time..if not..the govenrment office wil be attack by a bunch of dog lover and their k-9 soon...like chines said..."lai chap, fong kau" - close the gate,release the dog...
hehehe

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu

(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414
http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 10, 2005, 6:17 PM

Post #42 of 62 (2090 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ERN] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
you know why...i'll tell you why...our MCA is a puppet in Parliment. Our PM say yes...nobody dare to say no...remember the 2 Gerakan rep who abstain from voting at the PORR issue last year...they got suspended. Cannot even abstain from voting...must say yes...all the time.

Lim Keng Yaik say too much empasis on islamic studies in school. next day, after lecturing from PM...claims he is misquoted. These are the idiots we have up there. Next election.....i'm gonna vote for DAP...at least they dare to make some noise..
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


kenken
Dog Kichi


May 11, 2005, 2:10 AM

Post #43 of 62 (2072 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
I agree with u guy we should vote for other parties instead specially Chinese area.


ERN
K9 Maniac


May 11, 2005, 7:07 PM

Post #44 of 62 (2065 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Hi

It seems that we have no much choice.CrazyPirate Do we?

My last 3 elections gave me no choice,Mad I will never vote for PASTongue, this will put my children's future in danger. I have moved into DAP area.

The other so called "Justice", I am sceptical, for me they are the same. "Yiak Kow Shiek" one cock color.

Frown

View my photo album

last update, ZEUS & Shiki's 2nd off springs, 16/09/2008. Yes 9.16!

http://s56.photobucket.com/...%20Zeus%20N%20Shiki/

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/ERN2/Dogs


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 11, 2005, 8:34 PM

Post #45 of 62 (2064 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ERN] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
at least DAP can bark very loud!! MCA & Gerakan - too many yes man.
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 11, 2005, 9:34 PM

Post #46 of 62 (2060 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ERN] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Hi all,

Please read the rebuttal from a reader regarding the stuppid association :

http://thestar.com.my/...885311&sec=focus

Great work Lisa!!
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


Gwinn
Old Kaki


May 11, 2005, 11:34 PM

Post #47 of 62 (2051 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ALL] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Hey guys,

Thanks for putting this up and I am sure glad someone did!! Reading the articles only made me angrier and also worried for all my doggies in SA. I used to live in Kota Kemuning but now am residing in a condominium in PJ. Fortunately, my family lives in a bungalow, however, with them banning rotties.. that is going to separate us and Chal-sec and Rod (both our Rotties). I don't know what plans my dad has with them at the moment, but it would be very very painful to let them go.

To all the people who stands supporting the dog owners in SA, a big thank you to you! and I surely know that with the constant disatisfaction of the dog lovers and dog owners, MPSA or the authorities will change their minds and start looking at the solutions of the problem, rather than taking the short cut!

Another article today came out in the Star, listing the types of dogs banned. It's just so sad...
Papasan, Mamasan, Jerry, Salsa, Samseng & Junior


ERN
K9 Maniac


May 12, 2005, 2:32 AM

Post #48 of 62 (2044 views)
Shortcut
Re: [khoo262] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
this Selayang Baru Anti-Dog Association Low Kim Hean is Cho Kow,

Frown

View my photo album

last update, ZEUS & Shiki's 2nd off springs, 16/09/2008. Yes 9.16!

http://s56.photobucket.com/...%20Zeus%20N%20Shiki/

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/ERN2/Dogs


tterrynick
Enthusiast


May 12, 2005, 2:37 AM

Post #49 of 62 (2043 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ERN] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
he is a sa-kar, butt-licker, apple polisher, glory-seeker... shame on him...

fatty lingling (left) and petite tutu (right), protected by handsome nicky at the back - my 3 precious babies.
now i have 4 babies but baby adek just cannot stay still for a photo-shoot!!


Toy
K9 Maniac


May 12, 2005, 7:37 AM

Post #50 of 62 (2029 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Gwinn] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
abstracted from my email, from a group of Shah Alam ppl which trying to make petition. "Dear all. Tha are have been forum on 09.05.05. With a following parties: MKA. pet food companys, police force, armed forces, DVS(vet dept.) ,SPCA, Anthony(representing the disabled), Home Ministry dept( representing the Parliment). We was tha'r too. Basically, this forum was to listen to our views on the issue, what actions can be taken to address the "dog biting". I can not give the detail answer now as these will be discussed by the relevant partis later. But, i can say that the rules issued by SHAH ALAM COUNSILOR are not yet approved by the Parliment. Not to be alarm, don't make any rush dicision to give away your babies. They have no rights to touch your dogs. If they ever come by to issue warning, sumons etc. ask them for Parliment approval letters. If they can't provid any, send them away!!!Parliment are the one who set the rulings not the counciler. SLEEP WELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We would like to provid the parliment with are petition and we need as much as posible and as soon as posibl signature. Unfornuatly the e-mail support are not aceptable. Attachment with this e-mail.Hope thet you can print it and let for people to sign it with the full name, I.C. number and signature. Please fax to me at 03-33233680 or call me at 012-3253377 so we cane meet in person. Thank you. NATASHA." take action! contact them!!


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 12, 2005, 5:59 PM

Post #51 of 62 (2101 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ERN] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
personally i prefer calling him a chow mau (running cat). The word dog is too good for him...
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


nicky_spykeaz
Doggyman


May 12, 2005, 7:54 PM

Post #52 of 62 (2095 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Toy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
do contact us and keep us inform where we can sign the petition ya...dog rule.....in a good way..dog listen not barking like a mad dog unlike some human..

Cheers ya,

Nicki the Devil live by the reputation of the name



boBby is a craz3 car PassaNger
Fat FaT other case Elegant Car GuEst
What make Me?
A LoYal huMan Driver.... Frown

NoBody is Prefect, Guess What i am Nobody
Nice to meet YOu

(Bobby+Nicky craze JT memBer)

BoBby San DogstEr
http://www.dogster.com/?158414
http://spykeaz-devil.blogspot.com/


ERN
K9 Maniac


May 12, 2005, 10:15 PM

Post #53 of 62 (2088 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Toy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Local council do not need Parliment approval, as I know.

Frown

View my photo album

last update, ZEUS & Shiki's 2nd off springs, 16/09/2008. Yes 9.16!

http://s56.photobucket.com/...%20Zeus%20N%20Shiki/

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/ERN2/Dogs


Toy
K9 Maniac


May 13, 2005, 7:22 AM

Post #54 of 62 (2078 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Toy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Im juz passing a msg, any query & support pls contact the given number, thanks.


khoo262
Enthusiast


May 14, 2005, 12:03 AM

Post #55 of 62 (2068 views)
Shortcut
Re: [nicky_spykeaz] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
maybe they should banned their holy priest too as he play a part in spreading the disease. also next time their prient need pay RM10 license a year and also need to go for 6 in 1 jab.

the owner of the priest need to go for training to control the priest, pick up his poo,etc.

Don't you agree???
finally..... khoo262 has come back to puppy.com


PSY
K9 Kaki


Oct 15, 2005, 3:32 PM

Post #56 of 62 (1985 views)
Shortcut
Re: [minglmy] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Hi fellow members of the forum,

This subject has been on the low profile lately but I am certain even now most of us who have dogs are living in fear of our local council. Just last week in P.J. while visiting a friend, I saw and idiot (adult) walking two dogs, one a mongrel on a brace leash and a doberman, oversize (well that is what it seems to me) off leash. The dob is not really behaving as it was darting around. Imagine other people taking their evening stroll with their kids, people who do not like dogs and people with religion that cannot like dogs, a menacing big dog darting around... just plan stupidity. Now, I urge fellow members please have some consideration for fellow dog owners and do not make this subject of dog ownership worse than what it is, by just walking your dog on a leash. Just in case, even if your dog walks on perfect heel (by your side at all time) still on a leash is better. It is better to say, "my dog has never snap or bitten anyone then my dog do not bite". Just consider, an individual is calm and not at all aggressive but I am certain if push hard enough this person will snap too.

Again, walk your dogs on a leash, ( it is the law after all). thanks for reading.


Jackal_lwk
Novice

Nov 17, 2005, 1:37 AM

Post #57 of 62 (1953 views)
Shortcut
Re: [PSY] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
 


Jackal_lwk
Novice

Nov 17, 2005, 1:53 AM

Post #58 of 62 (1952 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Jackal_lwk] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Dear All Dogs' Friends,

Hi! I'm new to this forum and website. Am I glad to have found this website. I'm currently stayin in Shah Alam too. And I'm now facing the stupid MBSA regulation of renewing dog licence. I've submitted my dog's photo, its kennel, my house, signatures from neighbours and RM50 for application! ($$ sucker). I wonder if any of you people know where I can raise my concerns of this stupid ruling eg. any associations or groups which can help us to voice our problems and talk to the government. It is so sad to hear that we leaving in the intermediate house can't have dogs and my first feeling was "ARE WE NOT HUMAN"?????? We have feelings for pets too!! Are they asking us to give away our dogs after taking care of them for years???? It's so HEARTLESS!!!! I think we have human rights!!! If my application is being rejecte... I'm sure to do something !!! So if any of you know of anywhere i can make noise, please let me know.


PSY
K9 Kaki


Nov 17, 2005, 4:15 AM

Post #59 of 62 (1943 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Jackal_lwk] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Hi Jackal_lwk,

I am not sure if you did response to my posting as there is nothing in it. From what I have read from your posting, my suggestion is, you should write to all the main newspaper and enclose a copy of your application plus also to M.K.A., S.P.C.A. if need be and try and embarrass the authority in to playing their hand. Do ask for a response from M.K.A. and S.P.C.A. so at least you know that what you have done to your home to cater for the dog is sufficent so if rejected you can then ask the council awkward question like for someone who do not know dogs how can you determine what is right and what is not. Send a copy of your application to the Menteri Besar too, registered post at least you know he has got it. In the mean time train your dog to a point whereby you can stop it from barking at a snap of a finger etc to show you have control of your dog. This is what I would most likely do and all the best.


Jackal_lwk
Novice

Nov 18, 2005, 3:16 AM

Post #60 of 62 (1908 views)
Shortcut
Re: [PSY] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
Hi PSY,

I guess you're right. I wasn't replying to your posting but was just using the heading to get help. Guess I'm bothered by my application status. Thanks for your guide. But i just wonder how will they react and hit back on me. My dog seldom bark... it's a labrador and its very very lazy. So far I've got no complain from neighbours as I don't let my dog out. Can you imagine,in the row of house where I stay, my 2 side and 2 opposite neighbours are chinese, other than that... all Malay. And they seems ok. Even, one of them like to bring his grandchild to see my dog.

You're right. I just wonder why those people are soooo.. confident that their dogs will stay still even when they see a cat or other dogs ??? Aren't they afraid their dog will run and get wild when its not leashed?

Adious.


PSY
K9 Kaki


Nov 18, 2005, 5:02 AM

Post #61 of 62 (1901 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Jackal_lwk] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
A dog reaction is all instintive, so you need to break by training. My dogs, Weimer and Dob will go for anything when they are "release" or their mode is "do what you like" but once their choke collar is on I can make them sit or down and a cat can run in front of their tracks they will not chase. It is all training really. If you wish to talk more on training give me a call st 019 231-1032, I may be of a little help. Oh, my other dog, the brindle coloured one, well whatever command she will go and if you are hanging on to her leash, rest assured you will be going with her for the cat, rat oir wahtever.


JoeSmith
K9 Maniac


Nov 21, 2005, 5:56 PM

Post #62 of 62 (1876 views)
Shortcut
Re: [PSY] Article from The Star 26/4/05 - Tighter rules for dogs in Shah Alam [In reply to] Can't Post
In Reply To
Oh, my other dog, the brindle coloured one, well whatever command she will go and if you are hanging on to her leash, rest assured you will be going with her for the cat, rat oir wahtever. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Laugh I like that. Cool I spoiled my dog, so that I can walk the dog without risking my health, life or limbs. BTW, my dog will listen to me, with or without collar. However, without collar the hearing senses are less accurate and less sensitive Tongue, thus requires giving the commands very loud and in a very stern voice.

 
 




Copyright 2001~ 2002 Hileytech Sdn Bhd , All Rights Reserved.  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement
 For comments and Suggestion, Please contact the Webmaster at puppy@puppy.com.my